Revision of claude_explain_orthogonally.md

adien revised this gist 1735228385. Go to revision

1 file changed, 28 insertions

claude_explain_orthogonally.md(file created)

		@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
1	+	## Prompt:
2	+	help me understand what "orthogonally" means in below context
3	+
4	+	But there's a corner case that can be somewhat confusing here, and it's one that I managed to crash into multiple times when I was implementing some code that works with this. Keys can be "possessed" by a process, and have permissions that are granted to the possessor orthogonally to any permissions granted to the user or group that owns the key.
5	+
6	+	## Response:
7	+	Let me break this down in the context of system permissions and keys.
8	+
9	+	When something is done "orthogonally" in technical contexts, it means it operates independently or perpendicular to another aspect - like two systems or sets of rules that work completely separately from each other without affecting each other.
10	+
11	+	In this specific case about key permissions:
12	+
13	+	1. There's one set of permissions based on who owns the key (user/group ownership)
14	+	2. There's a separate set of permissions given to whoever currently possesses/holds the key
15	+	3. These two sets of permissions operate completely independently of each other
16	+
17	+	To use an analogy: Think of a house key. There's:
18	+
19	+	* The legal owner of the house (ownership permissions)
20	+	* The current person holding the key (possession permissions)
21	+
22	+	These are "orthogonal" because:
23	+
24	+	* The owner's rights to the house exist regardless of who has the key
25	+	* The key-holder's ability to enter exists regardless of who owns the house
26	+	* One set of rights doesn't affect or interfere with the other
27	+
28	+	So in the code context, when they say permissions are granted "orthogonally," they mean the possessor's permissions exist and function completely independently from the owner's permissions - they're separate systems that don't influence each other.

Newer Older